Today there are two primary means to distribute media: Digital distribution and Traditional distribution. Digital Distribution is essentially the distribution of any media text ranging from music, videos, video games, software without the use of physical media and is usually done over the media either by the process of being up for purchase or ready for streaming both legal and illegal. Downloadable content has been popularized and made possible by this method of distribution. As bandwidth capabilities increased it became predominant in the 2000's. Specialist networks such as content delivery networks help distribute media across the internet by assuring high avaliablity and performance. Alternatively there is peer-to-peer sharing.
There is a lot of impact on the market from this form of distribution, music and movies are easily steamed or purchased online or sampled using micro transactions such as Paypal. Although the conversion to mp3's has allowed for file compression without loss of sound it has made it easier for the media to be pirated. But this form of distribution also removes the need for physically space and storage and gives an artist more control over their work. Television as well has also been made readily available as it is distributed online, whether this be over PlayStation Network, Xbox live or YouTube - Films on demand, and in many cases the inverse is possible as YouTube can now be viewed via ones Television. Books such as eBooks for kindles and such have been made easier and cheaper to make and distribute similarly to online newspapers removing the need for would be paper boys. The convergence of technology and the digital revolution have made this possible.
Traditional distribution is basically the reverse of digital distribution, it was the primary method of distribution before the digital revolution. It involved the manual delivery of physical copies of products such as books, DVD's or newspapers. It requires physical storage, workers to deliver the products, create packaging and further distribute it, it contains more chain levels than Digital distribution.
There are many sub methods of distribution including:
- Film distribution
- Record distribution
- Food distribution
- Digital distribution
- Content distribution
- Font Distribution
From these two main methods there are distribution channels. There are many factors in choosing a distribution channel including:
- Technical or complex products - often sold by specialist distributors.
- Customized products - if a customer wants a product to look a certain way.
- Type of product - convenience, specialty etc.
- Desired image for the product.
- Is the market geographically spread?
- Is it selling overseas?
- The extent and nature of the competition.
- The businesses size and scope.
- Its revenue objectives.
- Does it need to extend its distribution network?
- How much control does it want over distribution?
- Are there limitations on sale in relation to legal aspects?
- What are the risks if sold to an inappropriate customer?
The difference between these two methods of distribution is that purely digital distributors such as iTunes need not worry about the confines of not having enough digital space and such can sell and distribute an unlimited amount of products. Because of the pricing and need of physical storage for physical copies traditional distributors mainly focus on selling the top 10-20% best selling artists to maximize profits, because digital distributors don't have to worry about this they can sell virtually any number of artists they want at any time, whether in the top 20, this phenonomon is referred to as Longtail.
In the 20th Century media was distributed in only a few very refined ways. If it was a newspaper print company in question they would produce the text as a newspaper or magazine it was transported to an outlet via van or transportation vehicle, people visited the the outlet, purchased the material and consumed it. If it was in relation to broadcast, a piece of media text was broadcast at a certain times and the audience would hear it or watch it and in turn consume the distributed media. Journalism (editing), publishing(printing) and distributing(postage) was three separate actions taking by different companies. People where trained in their field and highly adept at it, this allowed for proper and appropriate actions to be taking in each sector.
In the 21st Century everything has changed, in a sense everyone in a publisher and distributor now, everyone is a paper boy now. Technological advances have made this wealth of choices available distribution has all but become primarily online making distribution easier and cheaper but there is still the large risk of online piracy which in recent years become harder for pirates to do. Because of the convergence of technology everything that would have had to go through multiple distribution chains can instead go through a single mac, no longer are multiple layers needed to distribute a product when it can all be done by the prosumer, in this way we are all in control over how media is distributed. They have allowed for more storage, access to distribution on the movie (mobile distribution) from simply a mobile (this also shows the convergence of media).
Convergence of technology refers to how many products have been merged into one and offer all the benefits on a single mobile platform such as a Mac. This allows for easier distribution to be done from within ones home as no longer is frantic distribution chains needed as the distribution can easily be managed via an iPhone or such.
The consumer can now access the media in the way they want, how they want to and when in relation to distribution. Mobile access such as iPods have become more appealing to the consumer as they can distribute and receive media on the go. The internet has been one of the main factors of this as it has allowed for these digital distribution chains to be easily accessed, like wise made easily accessible similarly to eh aesthetic looks of the new iPhone models as they attempt to grab the audiences attention. Vertical and horizontal integration occurs in both these cases.
Because it is easier to distribute media there is more media as a result available to the audience, this is both good and bad. There is a larger variety of media available but at the same time its more difficult yo find the talent amongst the mass media. Promotions may occur through the likes of Facebook as well. The threat of illegal downloading has been a hindrance brought about by this convergence as a downside but it has allowed media as a whole to be distributed easier, cheaper and faster.
The future of distribution seems to be more and more digital based as the need for physical distribution is becoming rarer. The future appears to be centered more about mobile distribution that is available to consumers on the move, this is easier and more accessible and once again by removing the need for physical storage is advantageous.
Tuesday, 7 May 2013
Sunday, 21 April 2013
Case Study - Soul Jazz Records
Soul Jazz Records is a British record label formed in 1990 produces and distributes a multitude of different precise genres of music, unlike modern labels SJR produces a lot of music deemed "underground" by social conventions, it distributes many genres that people would be unfamiliar with or maybe have never heard before. Horizontal Integration occured when SJR forged an association with Studio ones founder Clement Dodd in the 1990s. There is also many sub labels - Universal Sound and World Audio Foundation Also the label produces music globally unlike many big named labels such as WMG who typically only produce western artists (i.e. English speaking European, Cuban and American artists), SJR produces music from many years ago as well as artists from:
Jamaica - (600% Dynamite), http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=132
Haiti - (Spirits of life- Hatian Vodou) (Rara in Hatiai), http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=220
New York - (Osunlade - Paradigm) http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=171
Miami - (Miami Sound) http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=109
Brazil - (Tropicilia) (Tetine- Let your x's be y's) http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=2682
Germany - Deutsche Eliktronishe Musik http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=18676
England (an England story) (Steppas' Delight 1). http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=11133
And many more.
It also recognizes the Black rights movement especially in the music industry (there was a certain stigma about a black artist during certain periods- Freedom, Rhythm and Sound) in which the music itself wouldn't have sold very well, SJR has attempted to re-release this music into circulation.
Soul Jazz records produces the following genres of music:
- Electronic
- Reggae
- Dub-step
- Jazz
- House Music
- Funk & Soul
- African
- Deep Cult and Roots Music
- Punk
- Hip-Hop
- German Rock & Electronic
- Latina/ Salsa
- Brazil
- Funk and Soul 45's
- Soundtracks
- Compilations
- Ska
- Rock Steady
This is a diverse yet very focused variation of genres, its not typical nor is it what we would call mainstream music (Pop and certain Rock). The artists under the SJR label are primarily composed of black artists (this adheres to the social convention in that stereo-typically society tends to think of black artists when the genre is Soul or Jazz). The age of the music varies as well but is typically music from 1920-1990s that has been remastered and re-released to the music industry. This is music that may have been overlooked at the time and that may appeal to a desired audience. Other featured artists are from Jamaica Haiti and Brazil amongst others; these are not typical artists that mainstream society would tend to listen to, this is mainly due to ignorance and a lack of knowledge on the subject and genre. But not all the music is aged, many tracks and albums are brand new, some released in 2013 such as Hieroglyphic Being. it's also worth noting that there is a large biography on nearly every artist and album. This is unlike many big name producers today who only have (minimal) information on big named artists under their label such as iTunes.
Some key signings include :
- Arthur Russell
- ESG
- Distal
- Radio Slave
- Randomer
- Hieroglyphic Being
- Silkie
- The Heatwave
- Osunlade
- Fife
The range of music is not the only thing not following the typical conventions society holds towards the music industry, the way the consumer interacts with the website in relation to purchasing content is also conflictive The consumer has the ability to purchase CD's, 7" or 12" vinyls, LP's and Mp3 versions. This appears to be very pre digital era, it appears to focus more on hard copy vinyls rather than digital downloads, but its till allows for the purchase of mp3 data. Music can also be pre ordered for release and can be left as a reminder to SJR if the content is currently out of stock. Merchandise is a key element on this website such as T-Shirts, clothing, bags, posters, tooth brushes, stickers, fliers, vouchers (the premise is to get the audience to spend money on their content). They also use promotion methods through the selling of the likes of books (Rare out of print books), signings, DVDs and videos.
From the second you enter the URL thirty-five random albums appear on the screen, this is to help shuffle the library and make available some albums that wouldn't normally be reached on the list contained within the website. Once the consumer enters the website all you need is on screen without the need to scroll, relatively big named releases appear large at the head of the page and draws attention easily. The colour scheme is also very simplistic yet effective, black background with white writing and vivid - retro colored important links and important gigs and advertisements on the left side. Information for each artist appears at the bottom of each individual page which results in the audience not being "put off" by large amounts of text. There is the option for a preview on most songs and the content can be purchased with ease as is the details on which versions of the content is available for purchase on the desired platform (LPs or CDs for example). Compilations are also found in abundance on this website as the offer a range of artists in a desired genre. They tend not to focus too much on aesthetic looks but rather on the abundance of information presented and its neat and precise layout making everything easy to access. There is also a newsletter, twitter and Facebook page in which the label uses to promote and distribute its content. There is also a lot of promotion of gigs and concerts of the various artists under their label, as well as (paid or free) small festivals, even in Ireland. There is even links to record studios - Sounds of the Universe.
There isn't a distinct audience for SJR, there is a range of underground genres that appeal to many audiences who enjoy electronic or Reggae for example. The name Soul Jazz may appear to many admires of that genre and might attract their attention as well those who enjoy aged music or classics that might not have had any play time or minimal circulation. The gigs and such also allow many new consumers (a new audience) to be exposed to the music. SJR focus more on remastering music and this might adhere more to the preferences of the older generation.
Soul Jazz Records is an independent labels with many sub labels and a partner company, it tends to deviate from the social conventions of the mainstream music industry. SJR attempts to re-release music into circulation which has almost been lost, aged music especially and of various countries and genres, this is opposed to mainstream music industry which tends tot to relaunch aged music. The prices of tracks and albums on SJR are significantly lower than that of the mainstream music industry as is the prices of concerts. In a sense SJR is a platform for the consumer to acquire underground music as well as fresh unique music artists in contrast to the fame attained by the various artists under more renowned labels.
Jamaica - (600% Dynamite), http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=132
Haiti - (Spirits of life- Hatian Vodou) (Rara in Hatiai), http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=220
New York - (Osunlade - Paradigm) http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=171
Miami - (Miami Sound) http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=109
Brazil - (Tropicilia) (Tetine- Let your x's be y's) http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=2682
Germany - Deutsche Eliktronishe Musik http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=18676
England (an England story) (Steppas' Delight 1). http://www.souljazzrecords.co.uk/releases/?id=11133
And many more.
It also recognizes the Black rights movement especially in the music industry (there was a certain stigma about a black artist during certain periods- Freedom, Rhythm and Sound) in which the music itself wouldn't have sold very well, SJR has attempted to re-release this music into circulation.
Soul Jazz records produces the following genres of music:
- Electronic
- Reggae
- Dub-step
- Jazz
- House Music
- Funk & Soul
- African
- Deep Cult and Roots Music
- Punk
- Hip-Hop
- German Rock & Electronic
- Latina/ Salsa
- Brazil
- Funk and Soul 45's
- Soundtracks
- Compilations
- Ska
- Rock Steady
This is a diverse yet very focused variation of genres, its not typical nor is it what we would call mainstream music (Pop and certain Rock). The artists under the SJR label are primarily composed of black artists (this adheres to the social convention in that stereo-typically society tends to think of black artists when the genre is Soul or Jazz). The age of the music varies as well but is typically music from 1920-1990s that has been remastered and re-released to the music industry. This is music that may have been overlooked at the time and that may appeal to a desired audience. Other featured artists are from Jamaica Haiti and Brazil amongst others; these are not typical artists that mainstream society would tend to listen to, this is mainly due to ignorance and a lack of knowledge on the subject and genre. But not all the music is aged, many tracks and albums are brand new, some released in 2013 such as Hieroglyphic Being. it's also worth noting that there is a large biography on nearly every artist and album. This is unlike many big name producers today who only have (minimal) information on big named artists under their label such as iTunes.
Some key signings include :
- Arthur Russell
- ESG
- Distal
- Radio Slave
- Randomer
- Hieroglyphic Being
- Silkie
- The Heatwave
- Osunlade
- Fife
The range of music is not the only thing not following the typical conventions society holds towards the music industry, the way the consumer interacts with the website in relation to purchasing content is also conflictive The consumer has the ability to purchase CD's, 7" or 12" vinyls, LP's and Mp3 versions. This appears to be very pre digital era, it appears to focus more on hard copy vinyls rather than digital downloads, but its till allows for the purchase of mp3 data. Music can also be pre ordered for release and can be left as a reminder to SJR if the content is currently out of stock. Merchandise is a key element on this website such as T-Shirts, clothing, bags, posters, tooth brushes, stickers, fliers, vouchers (the premise is to get the audience to spend money on their content). They also use promotion methods through the selling of the likes of books (Rare out of print books), signings, DVDs and videos.
From the second you enter the URL thirty-five random albums appear on the screen, this is to help shuffle the library and make available some albums that wouldn't normally be reached on the list contained within the website. Once the consumer enters the website all you need is on screen without the need to scroll, relatively big named releases appear large at the head of the page and draws attention easily. The colour scheme is also very simplistic yet effective, black background with white writing and vivid - retro colored important links and important gigs and advertisements on the left side. Information for each artist appears at the bottom of each individual page which results in the audience not being "put off" by large amounts of text. There is the option for a preview on most songs and the content can be purchased with ease as is the details on which versions of the content is available for purchase on the desired platform (LPs or CDs for example). Compilations are also found in abundance on this website as the offer a range of artists in a desired genre. They tend not to focus too much on aesthetic looks but rather on the abundance of information presented and its neat and precise layout making everything easy to access. There is also a newsletter, twitter and Facebook page in which the label uses to promote and distribute its content. There is also a lot of promotion of gigs and concerts of the various artists under their label, as well as (paid or free) small festivals, even in Ireland. There is even links to record studios - Sounds of the Universe.
There isn't a distinct audience for SJR, there is a range of underground genres that appeal to many audiences who enjoy electronic or Reggae for example. The name Soul Jazz may appear to many admires of that genre and might attract their attention as well those who enjoy aged music or classics that might not have had any play time or minimal circulation. The gigs and such also allow many new consumers (a new audience) to be exposed to the music. SJR focus more on remastering music and this might adhere more to the preferences of the older generation.
Soul Jazz Records is an independent labels with many sub labels and a partner company, it tends to deviate from the social conventions of the mainstream music industry. SJR attempts to re-release music into circulation which has almost been lost, aged music especially and of various countries and genres, this is opposed to mainstream music industry which tends tot to relaunch aged music. The prices of tracks and albums on SJR are significantly lower than that of the mainstream music industry as is the prices of concerts. In a sense SJR is a platform for the consumer to acquire underground music as well as fresh unique music artists in contrast to the fame attained by the various artists under more renowned labels.
Horizontal and Vertical Integration
Vertical Integration is the process by which a media companies acquires another in a different stage in the production and distribution process. Such as the methods and actions of apple, as the hardware is not typically manufactured by apple vertical integration occurred between Foxconn and Pegatron.. Horizontal integration is the acquisition of business activities in similar or different media industries, usually through partnership or such (merging). A basic example would be of a media company owning a radio station, newspaper, magazine company, book firm and television channel.
Hardware
The physical components contained within the piece of equipment in question such as a computer, these can be added or removed to upgrade various elements of the equipment. This is opposed to software contained on the Personal Computer or installed onto the equipment. This is the physical component used to create, market or produce media text.
Demographics and Physchographics
This is measurable characteristics of a subject audience such as age, gender, race, income, religion etc. As opposed to psycho-graphics which is a more sophisticated defined form of demographics relating to attitudes held by the audience, values and ideology views.
The Big 3
This is the term given to the three most prominent companies in any industry. In the music industry it is UMG, SONY and WMG.
Distribution and Marketing
The idea of initially marketing (the ways in which the media text is sold to the audience) the media (i.e posters, adverts, interviews, trailers etc.) and then making the media available for the consumers to view in a multitude of platforms (i.e cinema viewing, DVD release, digital release, samples etc.) Distributors (who go through the industrial process of creating the media) attempt to make the media as available to the audience as possible and tend to release the media at peak times (etc horror movies at Halloween). The marketers attempt to make the media known to the audience before hand. There is both viral (reproducing word of mouth via YouTube) and Guerilla marketing (low cost method aimed at creating a "buzz" around a film.
Subsidiary
A company owned by a parent company (essentially a secondary company, one that is controlled by another company).
Convergance
This occurs when when multiple items and products come together to form one product with the advantages of them all (e.g. no longer is multiple products required to play movies, it can all be done on a laptop). This is also the growing interactive use in film industry which enables people to share media easier. Basically any form of digital media can be accessed by one medium such as a phone.
Independant
When media is created, edited, produced, distributed and or marketed by a single individual or group without the use of big named labels or producers. These are Indie artists.
Download
The act of downloading (copying) a media file for ones own consumption whether legal or illegal through a computer and file service (utorrent or mediafire).
File Sharing
This is the public or private sharing of media often through peer to peer services, this is in respect to digital media and its consumption.
Copyright
This is basically an exclusive legal right given to an individual or organisation that allows only them to produce or distribute the product and if broken by another individual legal action can occur.
The Music Industry
Any company that produces, markets, exhibits or distributes music is part of this industry. Essentially the groups, companies and individuals that create and sell music to earn money. Composed of the various sectors of marketing and distribution.
Synergy
The interaction and co-operation between two agents to result in a greater effect than if they worked independently This is cost effective and beneficial for both agents.
Conventions
This is the traditions of society or how the social norm dictates how one should go about for example acquiring and consuming media (conventions show that purchasing of hard back physically media was eventually replaced with the less conventional digital media at the time).
Consumption
This is the purchasing and use of goods in relation to demand and global economics, the methds in which the media can be enjoyed and how they are used.
Production
The methods and actions involved in manipulating the raw inputs (in this case, the song, movie or music video) and through edits and eventually making a media text based on the public demand for it (i.e prodcing a single for press release).
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
Consumption.
The term music consumption is defined as ''Listeners may consume music by one of two ways, via live performance or through some other medium such as a radio''. This means that it relates to the methods and ways in which the public and the audience is able to consume i.e listening to the music. The consumption can be done in many ways through a varied choice of technology, genre, media and setting. Currently the most prevalent method of consumption is technological consumption: radio, stereo, TV, PC, Walkman or software application.
The digital revolution also known as the third industrial revolution is essentially the transformation from analogue mechanical/ electronic technology to digital. This progression began in the 1980's but only recently became predominant and primary. The full digital switch over of television occurred in 2012. As the digital era progressed more and more consumers started using digital methods of consuming music and technology, this is represented in these figures from 1990-2010:
Before the technological revolution the music industry as far as distribution goes was in a primitive state. 8-Track tapes (1960's-1980's) and Vinyl Gramophone records were the beginning of the mainstream consumption of music. To listen to these tapes and records one would need the equipment and basic technology required such as a the various players themselves, an audio amplifier if needed, the needle in some cases and many more primitive devices. These were big machines, heavy in some cases, expensive and were only suitable for one purpose: to play aloud their perspective record or track. If one was damaged it would have been difficult to find components needed for their repairs due to their high cost and lack of wealth amongst many of the consumers. Then came cassette tapes and the respective players and respectively the Walkman, this was revolutionary. This was the beginning of mobile consumption, the listening of music while retaining mobility, one could listen to music anywhere they want through this player and a set of head phones, basic technology, but this was the foundation of the technology available today. Later came the CD's which again were in their own right a revolution, they had a lot of data storage, especially in comparison to their predecessor and had the ability to display images both stills and moving.
Another source of music consumption was both live streaming and live performances. Live streaming at the time was vary basic, consumers had only the ability to listen to music through a radio and even so the music chosen to be played was down to the radio operators discretion. Concerts, free or paid performances this was the primary and favourite method of the consumption for many, it was better sounding in some cases than recorded tracks (due to the technology available and was a lot more personal for the band and the fans as opposed to simply buying the singles. This is emphasised by the fact that in 1966 the Beatles stopped touring due to the fans not being able to hear them play, the amplifiers available were not loud enough to drown out the screaming crowds of supportive fans. This still occurs today, and statistics show that concerts sales have increased over the years due to the digital revolution, for instance as the begin to hear about an artist they may want to see them for themselves.
The digital revolution has changed all of this. No longer are copious amounts of CD's and video tapes required to enjoy entertainment. In-fact all this can be done from ones Personal Computer. Through legal methods of music sharing one can achieve High Quality entertainment, they will have to pay for this pleasure though. This is opposed to illegal file sharing which grants the consumer the freedom to listen to all the music they want without wasting a penny.
Legal methods include: buying the single or album via such distributors Amazon mP3, iTunes and such applications and have them download straight to your computer through fiber optics. This is the most common method of consuming music: purchasing of the material and then within minutes having the ability to listen to it. Another popular method is via online streaming through the likes of Spotify, a subscription is required of £10 as opposed to the hundreds of pounds that would have been spent on hard copy sales. YouTube is another frequented site and the ever more popular YouTube converter which allows the user to download videos from YouTube for free (although not illegal its often viewed with distane due to its nature). The development and mainstream success of the internet allowed for this to occur. Another primary source of music consumption legally is through mobile technology such as mp3 players and via mobile phones. In a survey conducted 2005: 1 Billion users frequented the internet and over 2 Billion used a mobile phone, in 2010 the figures doubled as 2 Billion consumers used the internet, the growth of social networking (Facebook and Twitter - music is the most popular item shared) is a primary cause of this boom in usage and link between mobile technology and the internet.
Many methods such as filming a concert is legal and posting this online such as YouTube via mobile or transferring these files to USB after the show, file sharing and the internet allows for these files to circuit the internet and be viewed by others but in many cases not downloaded. The technology is available for the public to acquire this music so ''why not use it to facilitate their needs''. This in some cases may get out of hand and it is possible for the line between legal and illegal to become blurred. But this wealth of technology allows for easier possession of music (via digitally) whether this be a live concert ticket or an album. Sevices such as sky allow for the purchasing of concert tickets as do many other providers, advertisements often impact the world of music in such a way, the most recent case of this is the "dance pony dance" advertisement with Three, it featured "Everywhere" by Fleetwood Mac, this caused a boom in sales for this song and caused it to be charted in the UK Top 40, this was also positive press,for their upcoming tours, this viral advertisement was passed via the likes of tumblr and became famous almost overnight, the digital revolution affected this. Music such as pop and charted tracks remains in the public eye for longer and results in more downloads and more purchasing of material, as a result Pop artists tend to sell more albums due to the exposure to the public eye and mainstream success, in a certain sense the Digital revolution has counteracted this and allowed for less famous indie artists to reach success.
Then there is the illegal methods which have become more and more accepted in society, its easier and cheaper to download a whole album at your finger tips in seconds without spending a penny. There is the threat of being caught which is enough of a deterrent to many and the famous case in Paris proves that there will be actions taken against illegal downloads. But some people don't care about this threat, you can use certain websites to hide your IP and illegally download as much as you want through Isohunt and utorrent. This is the biggest repercussion of the digital revolution, people spend so much money getting a PC and various other pieces of equipment that their view is why waste money on music when its already available for them to download for free, and with unnatural ease. The frequency of illegally filming in a cinema has been diminished over the years due to the strict new guidelines and laws, but this is more difficult to do via the internet and people exploit this weakness, a major effect again of the digital revolution.
Besides for Digital consumption there is still many ways the public consume music, Vinyl records have become popular in 2013 showing record sales in decades, CD's such as Albums and live Albums are still common. Record stores while they might not be as prevalent as they were in the 70's-80's still allow consumers to purchase their tracks (records or CD's), HMV has recently announced its coming out of administration which emphasises that this aspect of music consumption isn't dead. Although there is still the ability to (illegally) burn music onto CD's and pass this amongst the mass public for free (a major factor caused by the Digital Revolution) a large audience still purchases hard copies of these from legitimate vendors.
The digital revolution also known as the third industrial revolution is essentially the transformation from analogue mechanical/ electronic technology to digital. This progression began in the 1980's but only recently became predominant and primary. The full digital switch over of television occurred in 2012. As the digital era progressed more and more consumers started using digital methods of consuming music and technology, this is represented in these figures from 1990-2010:
Before the technological revolution the music industry as far as distribution goes was in a primitive state. 8-Track tapes (1960's-1980's) and Vinyl Gramophone records were the beginning of the mainstream consumption of music. To listen to these tapes and records one would need the equipment and basic technology required such as a the various players themselves, an audio amplifier if needed, the needle in some cases and many more primitive devices. These were big machines, heavy in some cases, expensive and were only suitable for one purpose: to play aloud their perspective record or track. If one was damaged it would have been difficult to find components needed for their repairs due to their high cost and lack of wealth amongst many of the consumers. Then came cassette tapes and the respective players and respectively the Walkman, this was revolutionary. This was the beginning of mobile consumption, the listening of music while retaining mobility, one could listen to music anywhere they want through this player and a set of head phones, basic technology, but this was the foundation of the technology available today. Later came the CD's which again were in their own right a revolution, they had a lot of data storage, especially in comparison to their predecessor and had the ability to display images both stills and moving.
Another source of music consumption was both live streaming and live performances. Live streaming at the time was vary basic, consumers had only the ability to listen to music through a radio and even so the music chosen to be played was down to the radio operators discretion. Concerts, free or paid performances this was the primary and favourite method of the consumption for many, it was better sounding in some cases than recorded tracks (due to the technology available and was a lot more personal for the band and the fans as opposed to simply buying the singles. This is emphasised by the fact that in 1966 the Beatles stopped touring due to the fans not being able to hear them play, the amplifiers available were not loud enough to drown out the screaming crowds of supportive fans. This still occurs today, and statistics show that concerts sales have increased over the years due to the digital revolution, for instance as the begin to hear about an artist they may want to see them for themselves.
The digital revolution has changed all of this. No longer are copious amounts of CD's and video tapes required to enjoy entertainment. In-fact all this can be done from ones Personal Computer. Through legal methods of music sharing one can achieve High Quality entertainment, they will have to pay for this pleasure though. This is opposed to illegal file sharing which grants the consumer the freedom to listen to all the music they want without wasting a penny.
Legal methods include: buying the single or album via such distributors Amazon mP3, iTunes and such applications and have them download straight to your computer through fiber optics. This is the most common method of consuming music: purchasing of the material and then within minutes having the ability to listen to it. Another popular method is via online streaming through the likes of Spotify, a subscription is required of £10 as opposed to the hundreds of pounds that would have been spent on hard copy sales. YouTube is another frequented site and the ever more popular YouTube converter which allows the user to download videos from YouTube for free (although not illegal its often viewed with distane due to its nature). The development and mainstream success of the internet allowed for this to occur. Another primary source of music consumption legally is through mobile technology such as mp3 players and via mobile phones. In a survey conducted 2005: 1 Billion users frequented the internet and over 2 Billion used a mobile phone, in 2010 the figures doubled as 2 Billion consumers used the internet, the growth of social networking (Facebook and Twitter - music is the most popular item shared) is a primary cause of this boom in usage and link between mobile technology and the internet.
------------------------------------
Many methods such as filming a concert is legal and posting this online such as YouTube via mobile or transferring these files to USB after the show, file sharing and the internet allows for these files to circuit the internet and be viewed by others but in many cases not downloaded. The technology is available for the public to acquire this music so ''why not use it to facilitate their needs''. This in some cases may get out of hand and it is possible for the line between legal and illegal to become blurred. But this wealth of technology allows for easier possession of music (via digitally) whether this be a live concert ticket or an album. Sevices such as sky allow for the purchasing of concert tickets as do many other providers, advertisements often impact the world of music in such a way, the most recent case of this is the "dance pony dance" advertisement with Three, it featured "Everywhere" by Fleetwood Mac, this caused a boom in sales for this song and caused it to be charted in the UK Top 40, this was also positive press,for their upcoming tours, this viral advertisement was passed via the likes of tumblr and became famous almost overnight, the digital revolution affected this. Music such as pop and charted tracks remains in the public eye for longer and results in more downloads and more purchasing of material, as a result Pop artists tend to sell more albums due to the exposure to the public eye and mainstream success, in a certain sense the Digital revolution has counteracted this and allowed for less famous indie artists to reach success.
Then there is the illegal methods which have become more and more accepted in society, its easier and cheaper to download a whole album at your finger tips in seconds without spending a penny. There is the threat of being caught which is enough of a deterrent to many and the famous case in Paris proves that there will be actions taken against illegal downloads. But some people don't care about this threat, you can use certain websites to hide your IP and illegally download as much as you want through Isohunt and utorrent. This is the biggest repercussion of the digital revolution, people spend so much money getting a PC and various other pieces of equipment that their view is why waste money on music when its already available for them to download for free, and with unnatural ease. The frequency of illegally filming in a cinema has been diminished over the years due to the strict new guidelines and laws, but this is more difficult to do via the internet and people exploit this weakness, a major effect again of the digital revolution.
Besides for Digital consumption there is still many ways the public consume music, Vinyl records have become popular in 2013 showing record sales in decades, CD's such as Albums and live Albums are still common. Record stores while they might not be as prevalent as they were in the 70's-80's still allow consumers to purchase their tracks (records or CD's), HMV has recently announced its coming out of administration which emphasises that this aspect of music consumption isn't dead. Although there is still the ability to (illegally) burn music onto CD's and pass this amongst the mass public for free (a major factor caused by the Digital Revolution) a large audience still purchases hard copies of these from legitimate vendors.
-----------------------------------------------
Sunday, 14 April 2013
Independent research on changes in production in the music industry in the last ten years.
Music has evolved throughout the times. Initially music was difficult to propose and make available to the world, instruments were expensive, talent was difficult to find at times due to the lack of wealth in society and the nature of the industry at the time, people hadn't been exposed to the variety of genre we have currently nor was it as socially accepted. From the beginning of the proposition and composition of music difficulties were faced; it was expensive, at difficult to find a label who would sign an artist up who wasn't the stereotypical music icon i.e. attractive or who would take a chance with a young local or newly formed group (although there were exceptions). As new genre after new genre was made available to the audience then music slowly became more accepted in society as did the varying genres.
Ten Years ago, CD's were common and in huge demand, radios were used in greater frequency to listen to music and most substantially there was a great bond between artist, producer and distributor. This is because of the difficulty an artist faced in getting their music available for the world to hear, there was a lot of work put into recording, marketing, mixing and distributing the music which involved the artist all the way up to to PR companies, Label and Producer. Back then there was primarily on a pull factor of the artist making music, production marketing and distribution and occurs and people buy their work, now the consumers push back and want certain elements a certain way which has highly impacted the music industry.
Peer to Peer (PTP) networks became more and more prevalent in the early 2000's such as the likes of Napster. This increase along with the advancement of technology and the avaliablity of being able to download or stream music (although not as easily as it is today) caused a massive decline in the consumption of raw media in respect to 'Compact Discs', the music industry faced a huge decline in CD sales ( as opposed to the CD boom in 1984-1995 when profits margined above 30%) in a study as of 2008 it showed that consumers had spent less money on recorded music than the did in the 1990's, in all formats (mP3, cassette, CD, vinyl etc.) and yet even the huge spike in online media consumption that was made available which dominates the music industry distribution and consumption sectors today (such as iTunes and Spotify) could not make up for this loss of revenue at this early stage. There were many problems faced during the early period of digital downloads such as illegal downloading (the shutting down of Napster in 2001 and most recently the attempted closing of the pirate bay).
Today we have much more access to media at our finger tips, our primary source of consumption is via digital downloads as opposed to ten years ago although something that is much more prevalent today is illegal torrenting and sharing. Websites such as piratebay and isohunt attribute to this, as a result the music industry has taken a further hit in respect to paid sales (websites such as YouTube converter while may not be illegal still don't support or fund the artist and producer of the song converted).. To counter act this media distributors such as iTunes emerged in 2003 offering legal downloads which were easy to buy and consume and were also high quality.
CD's, Compact Discs (available since 1982 but only boomed in early 2000's -30 Billion discs sold as of 2004, 200 Billion as of 2007, sales have dropped exceptionally since) an optical disc able to contain a lot more substantial data than the vinyl records (created in 1888 by Emile Berliner, sales spiked in the 1980's and dropped as it left the main stream in the early 1990's - they are still shipped to this day and in 2008 2.0 million units were shipped) and cassette tapes (Compact Cassette- allowed for greater storage of media and offered the consumer the ability to reverse the music, invented 1962 by Philips and released to Europe in 1963) that proceeded it. These devices particularly the CD co-existed along with other devices with means of distribution such as the mp3 (a patented encoding formula format for digital audio files, and as a result many players were released to play these audio files such as: IXI, Eiger MPMan - 1997, Rio PMP300 - September 1998, Apple iPod - First Generation introduced on October 23, 2001 and began to appear on mobile phones by 2001 - the cited reason for the creation of the Apple iPhone) and the later mP4 (MPEG file format based on QuickTime publication on 2001, able to store and display real time images and stills etc. It also had its own range of players some containing a FM (Frequency modulator) transmitter - Lexar LDP-600FB: Anyka, a chip used by many mp4 players, AMV and MTV.).
Websites like: Napster were introduced in - 1999 , iTunes - initially 1998 , Spotify - 2006 , PTP - 1993/2003 , utorrent - 2005 , IsoHunt - 2003 , Amazon - 1994 , thePirateBay - 2003 . These are used for both distribution and consumption, some are legal and paid for, some are not and some are in between (YouTube Converter). Other devices used for the streaming, downloading or playing are the Personal Computer (first released in - 1965), Apple Macintosh - 1990 , PlayStation 3 - 2006.
There are many positive aspects of these changes : media is a lot cheaper and easier to access today, it is higher quality due to the equipment used, easier and quicker to make, easier to distribute and reach the rest of the world, anyone can make a song using just their phone and release it on the internet -iTunes, music genres have become more varied and respectively accepted, the increase in digital consumption has allowed for more jobs to be created in this sector, artists can more easily communicate with their fans throughout the world via Facebook and twitter (Pop singers Lady Gaga and Justin Bieber have currently the largest known number of followers on Twitter, yet recent studies show that a large sum of these may be fake accounts), it is easier to buy tickets for live concerts, more of a variety of storage is available to consume music on, materials are no longer wasted in the production of vinyls (not as much anyways) and so on. Artists themselves have different views on the evolution of the music industry such as Brandon Boyd from Incubus who stated in an interview that the ''internet has changed everything... the evolution is far from over'', he references how his band and rap-rock band Linkin Park have survived the changes in the music industry. He states that after the release of Linkin Parks album Hybrid Theory in 2000 that they would remain within the genre of rap-rock but instead ''broke free'' from its shackles and continued to evolve along with the music industry and adapted with it to become successful. (http://www2.gibson.com/News-Lifestyle/Features/en-us/linkin-park-incubus-music-biz-changes-0905-2012.aspx)
Although there has been some negative effects of these changes in the music industry over the last ten years: it can be significantly harder to distinguish the talented artists from the masses of average or lower artists publishing and revealing their music online, it can be argues with the avaliablity of things like auto-tune that real raw talent isn't needed which may result in the artists with more access to wealth will be more successful than a talented artist. There is less need for CD's, Vinyls and so on so jobs may be lost in the creation of these and since the respective players are no longer used (phonograph - released 1887 by Thomas Edison) are today viewed as antique items and mainly collect dust in many cases. It can also be argued that due to the avalibility of music on the internet that a fan isn't as communicative of supportive with an artist as they were ten years or more ago i.e buying records and going to concerts as opposed to today's pirating) (In 1966 the Beatles stopped touring because the fans were essentially too supportive, the band could not be overheard over the screaming fans even with state of the art amplifiers, this emphasises the bond the band had with its fans this is a stark contrast with some artists today who don't appear to have the same bond with their fans such as Rihanna who has had numerous instances of this lack of support in her fans such as turning up late for numerous concerts over 2012. (http://in.omg.yahoo.com/news/50-pc-justin-biebers-twitter-followers-fake-055827023.html)
Production has also been extensively heavily impacted over the years, it can almost be argued that in the current and or the near future that the need for production especially PR and production companies will be made redundant. The new push pull factor developed over the years and the available technology has made society impatient, why wait for an artist to make music when you can do it yourself, easily and fast all on your phone. Instead of writing the song, now today bands have writers for that. While years ago to have a record produced the easiest way was through a record store or hope to get the single broadcaster and in turn be picked up by a label, today we record the song ourselves and upload it to YouTube etc. and on the rare occasion a label recruits the artist.
------------------------------------------------------
Music is a very personal element to many people, it can be used as an emotive stimulant for many of its consumers, including me. Music has the ability to affect or influence a person in many ways regardless of genre. This personal nature makes the concept of music in turn delicate and personal to the individual, in the modern world with the newly introduced ease of access caused due to modern technology the music industry has found it easier to promote and introduce their music to the world via the likes of iTunes and so on. Although there is also a conflictive effect to this introduction of new technology in that with all of this ease of access to push and acquire this new music, how do we find the talented artists from the fame hungry or less talented artists? These talented artists might never get noticed due to the unreliable and unpredictable nature and distribution of the music industry. Luck and computer skills often prevails more than raw talent unfortunately.
Music itself is very easily obtained in this golden age of technology, while ten or more years ago the only ways of obtaining and exchanging music was buying the album or record in a record or specialist store. Nowadays music can be bought comparatively cheaper and easier, whether this be because we have more wealth to purchase the music or because people have a social obligation to own albums and such etc. Yet this is not often the case, social views on the exchange of music has become blurred over recent years, why purchase an album for £11.99 when you can torrent the album for free using the pirate bay, isohunt and utorrent? Why waste time and energy leaving your house to fund the already full and greedy hands of the music distributors, PR Companies and multi-millionaire fame hungry artists when you can hit a button and stream all the music you want for free? These ideals have become common and accepted in society, there is almost a stigma associated with actually purchasing a hard copy of an album, this is primarily the result of peer-pressure and laziness for the most part. But people often forget that this method of obtaining music is illegal. using these illegal sites while might be easy and free will not support local bands and will not fund independent artists. Sites like P2P and such are often used to disguise a consumers IP address so that the can download all the music they want without fair of being caught. As a result music has almost all but become 'free', as apposed to the hefty cost years ago. Personally I would prefer to order and consume my music through iTunes and Spotify primarily because of their ease of access which has developed over the years and their relative cheapness (especially Spotify which allows almost limitless streaming for a £10 subscription a month), or by ordering an album via Amazon which again is extremely simple to do. I know there is always the option for illegally obtaining this music or even verging legal methods such as YouTube converter but the fear of being caught and the consequences of the actions is enough to make me avoid that element of the obtaining and consumption of music, i'd rather spend my money to support an indie or local band.
Record players, fairly expensive, often difficult to use, heavy in some cases, large in stature and if damaged it would require further money to get the machine repaired, money which people didn't have, then there was the purchasing of a record, an object which contained two singles which in turn was quite expensive. This was just to play a single, once this song/single was finished you could turn it over manually to listen to the second song, there was no shuffle, repeat or song change. Record stores whether local or such as the likes of HMV where the main source of this music. To make music as an artist you would need the equipment, the motivation to push forward, a label, a PR company, money, an audience... essentially you need the methods, skills, talents and materials to make the music, a famed distributor and strong marketing campaign if an artist hoped to succeed and a method to reach as large of an audience as possible, it was all a lot of effort, time and money. Today you need an iPhone and an internet connection. No longer do you need this forceful push form artists towards labels, marketers and distributors as all you simply need to do is record your voice and upload your voice to YouTube or iTunes I have first hand experience in aiding a friend in this aspect of attempting to distribute personal music, and within an hour of deciding to cover a song it was recorded and uploaded to YouTube Within sixty seconds we had done what was near impossible years ago, an action which would have took months of hard work. CD's followed records, Compact discs which could contain multiple songs on one platform. Cheaper and smaller than records and more easily obtained. Even in recent years nearly all relatively big named stores sell CD's such as Tescos and ASDA. But because of technological advancement the concept of buying CD's is dying out, they have become more expensive to purchase and consume especially in comparison to listening or streaming via the internet.
Today music is available on nearly all platforms to download, listen, buy or stream. The range from TV, mp3's, mp4's, iPods, Ps3's, Xbox's, Computers, Radios, supermarkets and public transport to the likes of tooth brushes which play music when you brush your teeth or shoes which play a song when pressure is applied to the heel, music industries are trying for new, fresh and innovative ways of reaching a larger audience with their music. In the past the only ways to listen to music was via radio, TV or in concert, then followed records and CD's. Personally I choose the more modern methods of listening to music primarily via iPhone and computer, its easier and mobile, a pivotal element to the evolution of the music industry over the year. Never again do we have to be in one place to listen to a song, we can be on the move and hold an entire library of music at your finger tips, this has spiked the consumption of music and has made it more socially mainstream. But this does not mean people prefer these methods, many people I know without hesitation state that no matter what nothing beats the experience of hearing a band live in concert, that you may argue that your a fan, buy their music, download their single, stream their album, but you can never fully appreciate the industry and artist until you have shared the experience of sharing your support at a concert, something which has not changed over the years. Napster and Myspace are both prime examples of how the music industry has evolved over the years, these where world renowned companies which millions of users and a loyal fan base but as soon as something 'new and shiny' and innovative is introduced they are more often than not forgot about, iTunes has learned to adept to this social meme and has kept updating and constructing new formats and methods of distributing music in accordance to peoples ideals, it also helps that the mass use of marketing helps fund and reach a larger audience to obtain and keep its well renowned status. The ease at which these industries allow the music to be obtained effects how it is consumed, the likes of iTunes which is relatively easy to use allows for more inexperienced users to consume its content often at home, radio stations allow for the consumption of music on the go especially on public transport and phones and music devices ranging from the early Walkman to the mp3 and now Tablets and iPhone's combined with the advancements in headphone technology has allowed for more mobile consumption of music. This is caused primarily due to the converging of technology over the years, no longer does twenty pieces of equipment need to be used to listen or make music, a simple audio and capturing device such as a phone can be used instead. I own an iPhone and have the ability myself to make a song at anytime i want with no need for anything else but the phone, apps can handle all that for me which shows further how the music industry has evolved to distribute and market new ways to reach its audience.
I remember the many times in which I ventured into my garage and stumbled over the mass collection of my dads old CD's records and tapes, the ground was littered with cases books and film. I could spend hours searching for an album and when I finally find it I discover a sharp crack crawling down the edge of the CD, my heart sank every time this happened, I could never bare to see a disk damaged and need thrown out. Not now a days, all my music is stored either via my computers iTunes library or via Soundcloud which shows just really how the music industry has affected how I obtain and store music, sure I still have the odd album but not nearly in as high a frequency as I did years ago. It is easily stored and organised via this newly developed and reconstructed method.
Artists but a lot of hard work into promoting and constructing their image and music. Although this is not nearly as difficult as it was to do years ago as today instead of just a push from the production side was needed to promote and sell music this is replaced with a push pull factor as in turn the fans, consumers and audience pressures the production side to make more music in a certain appealing way. Similarly the ways of communicating with an artist has evolved further because of the evolution and convergence of technology, in place of writing a note to an artist there is now emails, Facebook twitter and so on. Artists often react towards how their mass audience or fans respond on social networking sites and the like. Likewise the methods of supporting an artist has changed, from simply buying their music to seeing them live to buying merchandise and more recently 'liking statuses' on Facebook these interactions show support but the primary source of support is still buying a bands music and seeing them in concert. Personally I enjoy helping to fund local bands and seeing as many bands live as I can for the experience.
There are always concerns a consumer faces when acquiring music, usually government action such as the disconnection of your internet by your service provider or further legal action. This does deter me from doing certain actions such as illegally torrenting music. Likewise this encourages me to buy music from an artist, similar to how good communication with fans, loyalty and ability to communicate with them in fun and intuitive ways, but on the other hand it is very expensive to pay for music and if there is no loyalty or showmanship towards the audience then the band isn't worth my money But unlike my family I download music on a daily basis, i'm constantly streaming and listening to my favourite bands and new indie artists, this is mainly due to me growing up surrounded by all this technology unlike my family members. With respect to my friends i may not be as passionate as some of them, music appears to be a greater part of their lives, but I am certain that I consume a significantly similar, whether this be for fun and leisure time, for reminiscences or other reasons I am almost always downloading something at any time. My parents pay for the broadband and they are fully aware of how I acquire all my music because I have to spend money and I never stop complaining about it.#
Wednesday, 10 April 2013
Music Reflection
Music is a very personal element to many people, it can be used as an emotive stimulant for many of its consumers, including me. Music has the ability to affect or influence a person in many ways regardless of genre. This personal nature makes the concept of music in turn delicate and personal to the individual, in the modern world with the newly introduced ease of access caused due to modern technology the music industry has found it easier to promote and introduce their music to the world via the likes of iTunes and so on. Although there is also a conflictive effect to this introduction of new technology in that with all of this ease of access to push and acquire this new music, how do we find the talented artists from the fame hungry or less talented artists? These talented artists might never get noticed due to the unreliable and unpredictable nature and distribution of the music industry. Luck and computer skills often prevails more than raw talent unfortunately.
Music itself is very easily obtained in this golden age of technology, while ten or more years ago the only ways of obtaining and exchanging music was buying the album or record in a record or specialist store. Nowadays music can be bought comparatively cheaper and easier, whether this be because we have more wealth to purchase the music or because people have a social obligation to own albums and such etc. Yet this is not often the case, social views on the exchange of music has become blurred over recent years, why purchase an album for £11.99 when you can torrent the album for free using the pirate bay, isohunt and utorrent? Why waste time and energy leaving your house to fund the already full and greedy hands of the music distributors, PR Companies and multi-millionaire fame hungry artists when you can hit a button and stream all the music you want for free? These ideals have become common and accepted in society, there is almost a stigma associated with actually purchasing a hard copy of an album, this is primarily the result of peer-pressure and laziness for the most part. But people often forget that this method of obtaining music is illegal. using these illegal sites while might be easy and free will not support local bands and will not fund independent artists. Sites like P2P and such are often used to disguise a consumers IP address so that the can download all the music they want without fair of being caught. As a result music has almost all but become 'free', as apposed to the hefty cost years ago. Personally I would prefer to order and consume my music through iTunes and Spotify primarily because of their ease of access which has developed over the years and their relative cheapness (especially Spotify which allows almost limitless streaming for a £10 subscription a month), or by ordering an album via Amazon which again is extremely simple to do. I know there is always the option for illegally obtaining this music or even verging legal methods such as YouTube converter but the fear of being caught and the consequences of the actions is enough to make me avoid that element of the obtaining and consumption of music, i'd rather spend my money to support an indie or local band.
Record players, fairly expensive, often difficult to use, heavy in some cases, large in stature and if damaged it would require further money to get the machine repaired, money which people didn't have, then there was the purchasing of a record, an object which contained two singles which in turn was quite expensive. This was just to play a single, once this song/single was finished you could turn it over manually to listen to the second song, there was no shuffle, repeat or song change. Record stores whether local or such as the likes of HMV where the main source of this music. To make music as an artist you would need the equipment, the motivation to push forward, a label, a PR company, money, an audience... essentially you need the methods, skills, talents and materials to make the music, a famed distributor and strong marketing campaign if an artist hoped to succeed and a method to reach as large of an audience as possible, it was all a lot of effort, time and money. Today you need an iPhone and an internet connection. No longer do you need this forceful push form artists towards labels, marketers and distributors as all you simply need to do is record your voice and upload your voice to YouTube or iTunes I have first hand experience in aiding a friend in this aspect of attempting to distribute personal music, and within an hour of deciding to cover a song it was recorded and uploaded to YouTube Within sixty seconds we had done what was near impossible years ago, an action which would have took months of hard work. CD's followed records, Compact discs which could contain multiple songs on one platform. Cheaper and smaller than records and more easily obtained. Even in recent years nearly all relatively big named stores sell CD's such as Tescos and ASDA. But because of technological advancement the concept of buying CD's is dying out, they have become more expensive to purchase and consume especially in comparison to listening or streaming via the internet.
Today music is available on nearly all platforms to download, listen, buy or stream. The range from TV, mp3's, mp4's, iPods, Ps3's, Xbox's, Computers, Radios, supermarkets and public transport to the likes of tooth brushes which play music when you brush your teeth or shoes which play a song when pressure is applied to the heel, music industries are trying for new, fresh and innovative ways of reaching a larger audience with their music. In the past the only ways to listen to music was via radio, TV or in concert, then followed records and CD's. Personally I choose the more modern methods of listening to music primarily via iPhone and computer, its easier and mobile, a pivotal element to the evolution of the music industry over the year. Never again do we have to be in one place to listen to a song, we can be on the move and hold an entire library of music at your finger tips, this has spiked the consumption of music and has made it more socially mainstream. But this does not mean people prefer these methods, many people I know without hesitation state that no matter what nothing beats the experience of hearing a band live in concert, that you may argue that your a fan, buy their music, download their single, stream their album, but you can never fully appreciate the industry and artist until you have shared the experience of sharing your support at a concert, something which has not changed over the years. Napster and Myspace are both prime examples of how the music industry has evolved over the years, these where world renowned companies which millions of users and a loyal fan base but as soon as something 'new and shiny' and innovative is introduced they are more often than not forgot about, iTunes has learned to adept to this social meme and has kept updating and constructing new formats and methods of distributing music in accordance to peoples ideals, it also helps that the mass use of marketing helps fund and reach a larger audience to obtain and keep its well renowned status. The ease at which these industries allow the music to be obtained effects how it is consumed, the likes of iTunes which is relatively easy to use allows for more inexperienced users to consume its content often at home, radio stations allow for the consumption of music on the go especially on public transport and phones and music devices ranging from the early Walkman to the mp3 and now Tablets and iPhone's combined with the advancements in headphone technology has allowed for more mobile consumption of music. This is caused primarily due to the converging of technology over the years, no longer does twenty pieces of equipment need to be used to listen or make music, a simple audio and capturing device such as a phone can be used instead. I own an iPhone and have the ability myself to make a song at anytime i want with no need for anything else but the phone, apps can handle all that for me which shows further how the music industry has evolved to distribute and market new ways to reach its audience.
I remember the many times in which I ventured into my garage and stumbled over the mass collection of my dads old CD's records and tapes, the ground was littered with cases books and film. I could spend hours searching for an album and when I finally find it I discover a sharp crack crawling down the edge of the CD, my heart sank every time this happened, I could never bare to see a disk damaged and need thrown out. Not now a days, all my music is stored either via my computers iTunes library or via Soundcloud which shows just really how the music industry has affected how I obtain and store music, sure I still have the odd album but not nearly in as high a frequency as I did years ago. It is easily stored and organised via this newly developed and reconstructed method.
Artists but a lot of hard work into promoting and constructing their image and music. Although this is not nearly as difficult as it was to do years ago as today instead of just a push from the production side was needed to promote and sell music this is replaced with a push pull factor as in turn the fans, consumers and audience pressures the production side to make more music in a certain appealing way. Similarly the ways of communicating with an artist has evolved further because of the evolution and convergence of technology, in place of writing a note to an artist there is now emails, Facebook twitter and so on. Artists often react towards how their mass audience or fans respond on social networking sites and the like. Likewise the methods of supporting an artist has changed, from simply buying their music to seeing them live to buying merchandise and more recently 'liking statuses' on Facebook these interactions show support but the primary source of support is still buying a bands music and seeing them in concert. Personally I enjoy helping to fund local bands and seeing as many bands live as I can for the experience.
There are always concerns a consumer faces when acquiring music, usually government action such as the disconnection of your internet by your service provider or further legal action. This does deter me from doing certain actions such as illegally torrenting music. Likewise this encourages me to buy music from an artist, similar to how good communication with fans, loyalty and ability to communicate with them in fun and intuitive ways, but on the other hand it is very expensive to pay for music and if there is no loyalty or showmanship towards the audience then the band isn't worth my money But unlike my family I download music on a daily basis, i'm constantly streaming and listening to my favourite bands and new indie artists, this is mainly due to me growing up surrounded by all this technology unlike my family members. With respect to my friends i may not be as passionate as some of them, music appears to be a greater part of their lives, but I am certain that I consume a significantly similar, whether this be for fun and leisure time, for reminiscences or other reasons I am almost always downloading something at any time. My parents pay for the broadband and they are fully aware of how I acquire all my music because I have to spend money and I never stop complaining about it.
Music itself is very easily obtained in this golden age of technology, while ten or more years ago the only ways of obtaining and exchanging music was buying the album or record in a record or specialist store. Nowadays music can be bought comparatively cheaper and easier, whether this be because we have more wealth to purchase the music or because people have a social obligation to own albums and such etc. Yet this is not often the case, social views on the exchange of music has become blurred over recent years, why purchase an album for £11.99 when you can torrent the album for free using the pirate bay, isohunt and utorrent? Why waste time and energy leaving your house to fund the already full and greedy hands of the music distributors, PR Companies and multi-millionaire fame hungry artists when you can hit a button and stream all the music you want for free? These ideals have become common and accepted in society, there is almost a stigma associated with actually purchasing a hard copy of an album, this is primarily the result of peer-pressure and laziness for the most part. But people often forget that this method of obtaining music is illegal. using these illegal sites while might be easy and free will not support local bands and will not fund independent artists. Sites like P2P and such are often used to disguise a consumers IP address so that the can download all the music they want without fair of being caught. As a result music has almost all but become 'free', as apposed to the hefty cost years ago. Personally I would prefer to order and consume my music through iTunes and Spotify primarily because of their ease of access which has developed over the years and their relative cheapness (especially Spotify which allows almost limitless streaming for a £10 subscription a month), or by ordering an album via Amazon which again is extremely simple to do. I know there is always the option for illegally obtaining this music or even verging legal methods such as YouTube converter but the fear of being caught and the consequences of the actions is enough to make me avoid that element of the obtaining and consumption of music, i'd rather spend my money to support an indie or local band.
Record players, fairly expensive, often difficult to use, heavy in some cases, large in stature and if damaged it would require further money to get the machine repaired, money which people didn't have, then there was the purchasing of a record, an object which contained two singles which in turn was quite expensive. This was just to play a single, once this song/single was finished you could turn it over manually to listen to the second song, there was no shuffle, repeat or song change. Record stores whether local or such as the likes of HMV where the main source of this music. To make music as an artist you would need the equipment, the motivation to push forward, a label, a PR company, money, an audience... essentially you need the methods, skills, talents and materials to make the music, a famed distributor and strong marketing campaign if an artist hoped to succeed and a method to reach as large of an audience as possible, it was all a lot of effort, time and money. Today you need an iPhone and an internet connection. No longer do you need this forceful push form artists towards labels, marketers and distributors as all you simply need to do is record your voice and upload your voice to YouTube or iTunes I have first hand experience in aiding a friend in this aspect of attempting to distribute personal music, and within an hour of deciding to cover a song it was recorded and uploaded to YouTube Within sixty seconds we had done what was near impossible years ago, an action which would have took months of hard work. CD's followed records, Compact discs which could contain multiple songs on one platform. Cheaper and smaller than records and more easily obtained. Even in recent years nearly all relatively big named stores sell CD's such as Tescos and ASDA. But because of technological advancement the concept of buying CD's is dying out, they have become more expensive to purchase and consume especially in comparison to listening or streaming via the internet.
Today music is available on nearly all platforms to download, listen, buy or stream. The range from TV, mp3's, mp4's, iPods, Ps3's, Xbox's, Computers, Radios, supermarkets and public transport to the likes of tooth brushes which play music when you brush your teeth or shoes which play a song when pressure is applied to the heel, music industries are trying for new, fresh and innovative ways of reaching a larger audience with their music. In the past the only ways to listen to music was via radio, TV or in concert, then followed records and CD's. Personally I choose the more modern methods of listening to music primarily via iPhone and computer, its easier and mobile, a pivotal element to the evolution of the music industry over the year. Never again do we have to be in one place to listen to a song, we can be on the move and hold an entire library of music at your finger tips, this has spiked the consumption of music and has made it more socially mainstream. But this does not mean people prefer these methods, many people I know without hesitation state that no matter what nothing beats the experience of hearing a band live in concert, that you may argue that your a fan, buy their music, download their single, stream their album, but you can never fully appreciate the industry and artist until you have shared the experience of sharing your support at a concert, something which has not changed over the years. Napster and Myspace are both prime examples of how the music industry has evolved over the years, these where world renowned companies which millions of users and a loyal fan base but as soon as something 'new and shiny' and innovative is introduced they are more often than not forgot about, iTunes has learned to adept to this social meme and has kept updating and constructing new formats and methods of distributing music in accordance to peoples ideals, it also helps that the mass use of marketing helps fund and reach a larger audience to obtain and keep its well renowned status. The ease at which these industries allow the music to be obtained effects how it is consumed, the likes of iTunes which is relatively easy to use allows for more inexperienced users to consume its content often at home, radio stations allow for the consumption of music on the go especially on public transport and phones and music devices ranging from the early Walkman to the mp3 and now Tablets and iPhone's combined with the advancements in headphone technology has allowed for more mobile consumption of music. This is caused primarily due to the converging of technology over the years, no longer does twenty pieces of equipment need to be used to listen or make music, a simple audio and capturing device such as a phone can be used instead. I own an iPhone and have the ability myself to make a song at anytime i want with no need for anything else but the phone, apps can handle all that for me which shows further how the music industry has evolved to distribute and market new ways to reach its audience.
I remember the many times in which I ventured into my garage and stumbled over the mass collection of my dads old CD's records and tapes, the ground was littered with cases books and film. I could spend hours searching for an album and when I finally find it I discover a sharp crack crawling down the edge of the CD, my heart sank every time this happened, I could never bare to see a disk damaged and need thrown out. Not now a days, all my music is stored either via my computers iTunes library or via Soundcloud which shows just really how the music industry has affected how I obtain and store music, sure I still have the odd album but not nearly in as high a frequency as I did years ago. It is easily stored and organised via this newly developed and reconstructed method.
Artists but a lot of hard work into promoting and constructing their image and music. Although this is not nearly as difficult as it was to do years ago as today instead of just a push from the production side was needed to promote and sell music this is replaced with a push pull factor as in turn the fans, consumers and audience pressures the production side to make more music in a certain appealing way. Similarly the ways of communicating with an artist has evolved further because of the evolution and convergence of technology, in place of writing a note to an artist there is now emails, Facebook twitter and so on. Artists often react towards how their mass audience or fans respond on social networking sites and the like. Likewise the methods of supporting an artist has changed, from simply buying their music to seeing them live to buying merchandise and more recently 'liking statuses' on Facebook these interactions show support but the primary source of support is still buying a bands music and seeing them in concert. Personally I enjoy helping to fund local bands and seeing as many bands live as I can for the experience.
There are always concerns a consumer faces when acquiring music, usually government action such as the disconnection of your internet by your service provider or further legal action. This does deter me from doing certain actions such as illegally torrenting music. Likewise this encourages me to buy music from an artist, similar to how good communication with fans, loyalty and ability to communicate with them in fun and intuitive ways, but on the other hand it is very expensive to pay for music and if there is no loyalty or showmanship towards the audience then the band isn't worth my money But unlike my family I download music on a daily basis, i'm constantly streaming and listening to my favourite bands and new indie artists, this is mainly due to me growing up surrounded by all this technology unlike my family members. With respect to my friends i may not be as passionate as some of them, music appears to be a greater part of their lives, but I am certain that I consume a significantly similar, whether this be for fun and leisure time, for reminiscences or other reasons I am almost always downloading something at any time. My parents pay for the broadband and they are fully aware of how I acquire all my music because I have to spend money and I never stop complaining about it.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


























